tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14240039.post114399174054883820..comments2021-04-08T14:24:16.350+03:00Comments on От дума на дума: How to solve it?Zlatozarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16257250071061885492noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14240039.post-12548297777457138062009-02-17T10:26:00.000+02:002009-02-17T10:26:00.000+02:00Here is a interesting link that do the parallel be...Here is a interesting link that do the parallel between "How to solve it?" and programming (Haskell)<BR/><A HREF="http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/sjt/Haskell_craft/ProgInHaskell.html" REL="nofollow">http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/sjt/Haskell_craft/ProgInHaskell.html</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14240039.post-46013225130886682112008-10-30T10:45:00.000+02:002008-10-30T10:45:00.000+02:00What about wishful thinking that is described in S...What about <B>wishful thinking</B> that is described in SCIP? When approaching a new kind of problem, allow yourself to conceive of a construct, like a helper procedure, that could handle a reduction of the problem, and then proceed on planning the reduction of the problem as though the construct actually existed. This allows you to defer the challenge of actually implementing such a construct until later, when you’ll have had time to refine your understanding of exactly what your construct has to do. This kind of thinking is itself kind of iterative, and it also mirrors the design strategy of breaking big procedures down into smaller ones.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com